Lendmax Capital
Investor profiles and process

Who Should Invest in Mortgages? Who Might Consider It — and Who Probably Should Not

By Lendmax Capital MIC Investor Education Desk Current as of Legal & regulatory review 3 October 2026 Next scheduled review January 2027 8 min read

Short answer

No article can say who should invest in mortgages; that depends on one person's finances and is assessed in a registered dealer's know-your-client and suitability review. In general terms, investors who might consider it have money they will not need for years, other liquid savings, and the capacity to absorb a loss of some or all of the amount. It tends to fit poorly where money is needed soon, where capital cannot be put at risk, or where real estate already dominates a household's wealth.

On this page
  1. Who should invest in mortgages? Why no article can answer that
  2. What mortgage investing offers, and what it costs
  3. Investors who might consider mortgage investing
  4. Who probably should not invest in mortgages
  5. Mortgage investing for retirees in Canada
  6. How much of my portfolio should be in mortgage investments?
  7. Questions to answer before considering it
  8. What this means for a mortgage investor

Search for who should invest in mortgages and you will find confident answers: retirees, income seekers, anyone tired of low rates. This page does not give one, because the honest answer depends on facts about a particular person that no article knows. What it can do is set out, side by side, the characteristics of investors who might consider mortgage investing, the circumstances in which it commonly fits poorly, and the risks that decide between the two.

It is general education, not investment, tax or legal advice, and nothing here describes what any individual reader ought to do.

Who should invest in mortgages? Why no article can answer that

Suitability is an individual assessment, and in the exempt market it is made by a registered dealer, not by a website. Before a subscription is accepted, an exempt market dealer (EMD) completes a know-your-client (KYC) review of your finances, objectives, time horizon and risk tolerance, and a suitability assessment of the specific investment against them. Lendmax Capital MIC, for example, distributes its shares only through a registered EMD with KYC and suitability review before any subscription.

Qualifying under a prospectus exemption is a legal gate, not an endorsement. Being an accredited investor, or staying within the offering memorandum exemption limits, means the law permits the purchase; it does not mean the purchase fits. The steps from first conversation to subscription are set out in how to invest in mortgages step by step.

What mortgage investing offers, and what it costs

Every feature that attracts investors to mortgage investing has a matching cost. The table sets them side by side, on the basis of a pooled mortgage investment such as a mortgage investment corporation (MIC) shareholding; direct loans differ in detail.

Feature What some investors value What it costs or risks
Income Regular distributions from borrower interest Distributions are not guaranteed and can be reduced or suspended
Collateral Loans secured by real property Property values fall, enforcement takes time and money, and second mortgages recover after first mortgages; principal can be lost
Short loan terms The portfolio turns over and reprices as loans mature Your own access to money is set by redemption terms, not loan terms
No daily market price Holdings do not swing with stock-market quotes No secondary market; the value is not observable and the holding is illiquid
Tax treatment MIC dividends are taxed simply, as interest Interest is taxed at the full marginal rate with no dividend tax credit (as at October 2026)
Registered-plan use MIC shares are generally a qualified investment for RRSPs, TFSAs and RRIFs They can become a prohibited investment under section 207.01 of the Income Tax Act
Diversification Exposure that differs from listed stocks and bonds Concentration in real-estate credit, which tracks the housing market

Higher target returns compensate for higher risk; they do not remove it. Mortgage investments are not guaranteed. Returns are targets, not promises, and principal can be lost. MIC shares are not deposits and carry no CDIC or provincial deposit insurance. The broader context is in alternative fixed income in Canada.

Investors who might consider mortgage investing

Investors who might consider mortgage investing tend to share a set of circumstances rather than a demographic. Age, income or wealth alone does not settle it. The common threads:

  • A long time horizon for this money. They can leave it invested for years and would not be forced to sell if redemptions were delayed.
  • Liquid reserves elsewhere. An emergency fund and short-term savings sit outside the mortgage investment.
  • Capacity to absorb a loss. Losing some or all of the amount would be painful but would not change essential plans.
  • Tolerance for variable income. They treat distributions as a target that can fall, not a fixed payment.
  • Willingness to read the documents. They will read an offering memorandum and audited financial statements, or work through them with a registered dealer.
  • Eligibility under an exemption, confirmed by the dealer.

Can mortgage investments diversify a portfolio?

They can diversify a portfolio built mainly of listed stocks and bonds, because returns come from borrower interest secured on property rather than from market prices. The limit is that mortgage returns depend on the housing market and on borrowers’ ability to pay, so in a broad economic downturn mortgage losses and weaker markets elsewhere can arrive together. For a household whose home is its largest asset, mortgage investing adds to real-estate exposure rather than diversifying away from it. Concentration within the mortgage allocation matters too; see concentration and diversification in a mortgage portfolio.

What does a long-term mortgage investment strategy involve?

In a pooled vehicle, a long-term strategy usually means holding MIC shares or fund units for years while the loans inside turn over every few months. Investors who take that approach commonly make three decisions. The first is whether to take distributions as cash or reinvest them through a distribution reinvestment plan (DRIP), which compounds income by buying more shares but also enlarges the amount that is illiquid and at risk. The second is to review each year’s audited financial statements, arrears and concentration rather than relying on the original decision. The third is to plan the eventual exit, since redemption follows notice periods and the board can defer or suspend it. The DRIP compounding calculator shows how reinvestment changes a balance over time, using assumed rates that are not a forecast.

Who probably should not invest in mortgages

Some circumstances make mortgage investing a poor fit for almost anyone in them. These are general patterns, not judgements about any individual:

  • Money needed soon. Funds earmarked for a home purchase, tuition or a known expense within the redemption notice period, or within the time a deferral could last.
  • No emergency reserve. If an unexpected bill would force a redemption request, the holding’s illiquidity becomes the problem. The mechanics are in liquidity and redemption: getting your money out.
  • Capital that cannot be put at risk. Money needed for essential living costs has no room for a loss of principal.
  • Borrowed money. Borrowing to invest magnifies losses, and loan payments continue even if distributions stop.
  • A need for deposit-style certainty. Investors who require CDIC insurance and a fixed, certain return are describing a deposit product, which mortgage investments are not.
  • Heavy existing real-estate concentration. A home, rental properties and mortgage investments are all exposed to the same market.
  • Unwillingness to read the documents or to tolerate limited information between annual financial statements.

Mortgage investing for retirees in Canada

Retirees are often drawn to mortgage investing for income, and the same tests apply with more force. Income in retirement has to arrive when needed, and capital lost late in life is hard to rebuild. A retiree’s household might consider how distributions would be replaced if they were cut, and how a registered retirement income fund’s annual minimum withdrawal would be met if MIC shares in the plan could not be redeemed. The longer discussion is in mortgage investing for retirement income.

How much of my portfolio should be in mortgage investments?

There is no standard percentage, and any figure presented as a rule of thumb is a generalisation that cannot account for an individual’s liquidity needs. What can be shown is how the size of the allocation changes both the income and the damage when something goes wrong.

Worked example (illustrative)

A household has a $400,000 investment portfolio, separate from its home. Assume, for arithmetic only, a MIC distribution equal to 8% a year net of the MIC’s fees, a 40% marginal tax rate, and a stress case in which the MIC loses 20% of principal. None of these is a forecast or a recommendation.

Step 10% allocation 40% allocation
Amount in one MIC $400,000 × 10% = $40,000 $400,000 × 40% = $160,000
Annual distributions at 8% $40,000 × 8% = $3,200 $160,000 × 8% = $12,800
Tax at 40% $3,200 × 40% = $1,280 $12,800 × 40% = $5,120
After-tax income $3,200 − $1,280 = $1,920 $12,800 − $5,120 = $7,680
Stress loss of 20% of principal $40,000 × 20% = $8,000 $160,000 × 20% = $32,000
Loss as share of portfolio $8,000 ÷ $400,000 = 2% $32,000 ÷ $400,000 = 8%
Inaccessible if redemptions are suspended $40,000 $160,000

The larger allocation quadruples the income and quadruples the damage. There is also a legal limit: in Alberta, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec and Saskatchewan, an individual who is not an accredited investor can buy at most $100,000 under the offering memorandum exemption in 12 months, and only if an eligible investor receiving suitability advice, so the $160,000 column could not be bought that way in one year. Thresholds summarised; confirm current definitions with a registered dealer. Tax treatment is as at October 2026; confirm it with a Canadian tax professional.

Questions to answer before considering it

These questions turn a general profile into an individual one. Each has a document where the facts sit:

  • When might I need this money? Compare with the redemption notice period and deferral powers in the offering memorandum.
  • What could go wrong, and how badly? The risk factors in the offering memorandum and the impaired-loan notes in the audited financial statements.
  • What am I acknowledging? The risk acknowledgement form, where the exemption requires one.
  • What did I tell the dealer? The know-your-client form; check that it is accurate.
  • What else do I own that depends on real estate? Your own net-worth statement.

The full set of risks is in the risks of mortgage investing in Canada, and technical terms are defined in the glossary.

Common mistakes in self-assessment

  • Treating “secured by real property” as “cannot lose”. Collateral reduces loss; it does not prevent it.
  • Choosing the highest yield on offer. Higher yield usually means higher LTV, lower position or weaker borrowers.
  • Confusing loan term with liquidity. A six-month loan does not mean six-month access to your money.
  • Relying on past distributions. Past performance does not indicate future results.

What this means for a mortgage investor

Whether mortgage investing fits a particular person is decided by their time horizon, liquid reserves, capacity for loss and existing real-estate exposure, assessed in a dealer’s suitability review, not by a general profile. The characteristics above describe who might consider it and when it commonly fits poorly; they are not a recommendation either way. Anyone weighing it is weighing a specific investment that varies along seven axes — the borrower, the property, the loan-to-value, the security position, the term, the jurisdiction and the investment structure — and each of those changes the risk being taken.

Key takeaways

  • Whether mortgage investing suits any individual is decided in a registered dealer's know-your-client and suitability review, not by an article or a prospectus exemption.
  • Investors who might consider mortgage investing generally have a long time horizon, other liquid savings and the ability to absorb a loss of principal.
  • It tends to fit poorly where money is needed within the redemption notice period, where capital cannot be put at risk, or where a household is already concentrated in real estate.
  • Mortgage investments are not guaranteed, carry no CDIC deposit insurance and are illiquid; redemptions can be deferred or suspended.
  • There is no standard portfolio percentage; the right size is an individual judgement shaped by liquidity needs, loss capacity and existing real-estate exposure.

Sources

  1. Ontario Securities Commission — investors — OSC
  2. GetSmarterAboutMoney — Ontario Securities Commission
  3. National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions — Ontario Securities Commission
  4. Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation — CDIC
  5. Income Tax Act, section 207.01 — registered plan definitions — Justice Laws Website, Government of Canada
Investor questions

Frequently asked questions

Who should invest in mortgages?

No general article can answer that, because suitability depends on one person's finances, objectives and risk tolerance and is assessed by a registered dealer. In general terms, investors who might consider mortgage investing have money they will not need for years, other liquid savings and the capacity to absorb a loss. Mortgage investments are not guaranteed and principal can be lost.

How much of my portfolio should be in mortgage investments?

There is no standard percentage. The amount depends on how much money must stay accessible, how much loss can be absorbed and how much real-estate exposure the household already has through a home or rentals. In six provinces the offering memorandum exemption also caps individual purchases unless the investor is accredited, and a dealer's suitability review considers concentration.

Who should consider a MIC instead of holding a mortgage directly?

Investors who might consider a MIC rather than a direct mortgage are typically those who want exposure spread across many loans, prefer professional administration to managing one borrower, and accept that redemption is governed by the offering memorandum. A direct mortgage gives control and transparency over one loan but concentrates risk. Neither is suitable for everyone.

Can mortgage investments diversify a portfolio?

They can add exposure that behaves differently from listed stocks and bonds day to day, because returns come from borrower interest secured on property rather than market prices. But they depend on the housing market and borrower credit, so losses can coincide with broader economic stress, and they add real-estate exposure for households that already own property.

Keep reading

Speak with the investor desk

Explore Mortgage Investment Opportunities

Connect with our experienced mortgage professionals to discuss available mortgage investment opportunities, understand the underlying property and security, compare potential returns and risks, and determine which opportunities align with your investment objectives.

Request the offering memorandum Call 416-837-1414

Securities are offered by offering memorandum through a registered exempt market dealer. Not every investment is suitable for every investor.

Request Offering Memorandum